Subhas Chandra Bose disappeared after
Subhas Chandra, Netaji, and his elder brother Sharat Chandra Bose were Sarkar´s mother's cousins (called maternal uncles). Sarkar lived in Kolkata during the same time that Netaji was under house arrest in
When Indira Gandhi tried later to destroy Sarkar´s Prout movement, the only reason was not that Gandhi and Russian Communist Party kept Prout dangerous for national security in both countries; but on the other hand Sarkar´s support (adviser?) to Independence movement of India and Sarkar´s idea of an undivided Bengal, were probably also part of the reason.
Sarkar writes: The post-independence period can be divided into three main phases - the Nehru era, the Gandhi era and the Janata government. All these three eras came within the jurisdiction of Vaeshyan or capitalist rule and they all had one thing in common – they had a soft state policy towards the capitalists. Pardoning… can be practiced in individual life only, but it cannot be part of collective sádhaná…Mahatma Gandhi should not have pressed one government to pay fifty crores of rupees to another government against the interests and sentiments of the people of that country.
He should have said, “No. I do not support the communal award.” He did not say this because his party workers and party leaders were eager to become ministers, so they pressed him for provincial autonomy… What has happened in the country after this is the result of what Mahatma Gandhi did…. As a result of the communal award, the country was trifurcated into
They [Gandhi et all] should have engaged themselves in an economic fight instead of starting a political movement. The British took advantage of this blunder of the Indian leaders. They got the opportunity to divide
Had they [Gandhi et all] started a movement for economic independence instead of accepting the partition of
They tried to check the sanguinary revolution by preaching the theory of non-violence…Still, in the struggle for independence, the English language and the anti-British sentiment had made India one nation. With the departure of the British there is no anti-British sentiment, and so the Indian nation has died…
4 May 1986, Kalikata: On the eve of Indian Independence the method of struggle which most obviously stirred public opinion was a special technique of political warfare evolved by Subhash Chandra Bose…
The philosophy of Gandhi died before
What wrong did Subhash Bose do if he, as the representative of a freedom loving country which was trying to attain
This is some description ab war time by Sarkar: This was towards the end of British rule; the Second World War was in full swing, with the fiercest fighting in Europe and Southeast Asia. Most of
The coastal areas of
Despite the strong fortifications of the coastal area, the Indian National Army was making hectic preparations to wrest control of the coastal areas of
Blackouts were in force from city to city. In most places there were careful preparations taken against air attacks. Naturally, moving on the roads after dark had become extremely troublesome, so people used to finish work quite early and go home and close their doors and windows. Yes, even the windows had to be shut; otherwise the light from inside the houses would leak out into the streets and make it easy for the enemy to locate the site. People would be back home by dark and crowd together in one room to listen secretly to the radio news about the Indian National Army. Those who didn’t have a radio in their house would go to the house of someone who did, making for quite a crowd….In my town there was a daily blackout. Low-power bulbs had been fitted in the street lights and the lamp covers had been painted black so that the light would not be diffused very far.
Some famous people from Rahr the cradle of civilization: Rashbehari Bose, a flame of revolution, an outstanding man of action, who laid the foundation of the Indian freedom struggle outside
Gandhism is example of defective philosophy. Instead of guaranteeing liberation from exploitation, it favors the interests of the exploiters; hence it is a negative philosophy… No revolutionary organization can accept Gandhism as an ideal philosophy. If any organization does, then it will no longer be a revolutionary organization, and it will break apart within a short time. This is an historical inevitability. Thus, the revolutionary organization must adopt a positive philosophy which is without defects.
Prout, The Progressive Utilization Theory, blends spiritual with socialistic idealism – a formula familiar in
In Gandhism, we find two defects – psychological and material. Although Gandhism is not pure capitalism, it is undoubtedly a way to protect capitalism.… Secondly, Gandhism always tries to avoid fights and all sorts of struggle, including class struggle. According to Marxism, there are two main classes – the exploiters and the exploited. Gandhism does not recognize this sort of division… According to Gandhism, it is possible to transform the exploiters through persuasion. Theoretically, this view may be acceptable, but it is neither natural nor practical. If a goat tries to persuade a tiger, won’t the tiger eat the goat? Struggle is natural and indispensable. According to Tantra also, progress lies in struggle…We can conclude that the golden rule is: “Protect the virtuous; punish the wicked.” Humanity can be secured only if this principle is followed.
Those who are established in Yama and Niyama and have accepted the Supreme Entity as the goal of their life are capable of safeguarding the interests of human race. Such people alone are sadvipras and only they can represent humanity – they alone can serve all creation selflessly. Sadvipras will be identified by their conduct their commitment to service, their dutifulness and their strength of character…Only these sadvipras can warn the exploiters with a thunderous voice: “No exploitation of one human being by another! No exploitation in the name of religion!” Such sadvipras will become the trustees of society…They will only ensure that the rulers do not exploit society, thus they will rule the rulers.
September 1960, Ranchi: There is also a group of leaders who have genuine sympathy for the masses and who do not in their hearts support the Sarvodaya movement or Gandhism; but they nevertheless believe that the vaeshyas (capitalist exploiters) will be removed from power without a struggle through their plans for a welfare state. A change from one age to another can also occur through evolution. However, although it is theoretically possible to establish a welfare state or genuine economic freedom through evolution, in practice it will not work. It is true that in
Some of the philosophical interpretations of janmántaraváda [the doctrine of transmigration of souls, or reincarnation] also oppose revolution; that is, they argue, “You are starving in this life because you committed many sins in your last life, so what is the point of launching a movement? Destiny cannot be changed.”
I have said that kśatriya- (fighters) and vipra-minded (intellectual) shúdras (grass root level) will bring about the people’s revolution. For this, these shúdras will have to be thoroughly prepared, suffer a lot and make great sacrifices. They will have to fight against opposing groups and doctrines.
This is interesting what D Savitananda writes in his book about Subhash Chandra Bose:
The campaign spread like wild fire. Then Subhash´Azad Hind force (Indian National Army, INA) attacked British in
The Indian army soldiers started joining the Azad Hind due to those three point
statements. British Lord Mountbatten called to Nehru and Gandhi on 15.8-47 and
demanded that they had to hand over Subhash Chandra Bose either dead or alive,
only then they would give independence to India . Subhash Chanra Bose had just
won All India Congress president elections defeating Gandhi’s candidate. India
The Indian army was out of British control and they had to escape in the mid night of 15.8-47. So in reality
Nehru also divided
1951 Sarkar showed in a special demonstration, that Nehru was in his past life great spiritualist, but he got a strong desire to enjoy the world, so he became a famous leader in this life, but after death he became a dog in Britain - brought up by Lord Mountbatten! Later Sarkar also demonstrated (helping someone’s mind to alter Subhash mind) what happened with Subhash. He was seen meditating in
AND what Sai Baba said about Subhas: In a surprise departure from tradition, Swami Sai Baba asked a few elders to speak on
“None of you asked me to speak. But it is my love for Bose, that made me speak today. Such people must be born again in Bharat (
“Once when Subhas Chandra Bose was a student of the
Thus, Subhas sacrificed his education for the sake of upholding the honor of his motherland. Consequently his father sent Subhas to
- Baba 1990
“No one acts. Everyone delivers speeches. I feel a stabbing pain that there is not a single Bose today. Tell me is there any one? One Bose is enough. Bose truly understood the plight of
- Baba on
Bose was very strong and powerful, in body, mind and in spiritual splendor. He always desired that
- Baba on
He travelled to
- Baba, Independence Day, 2007, http://media.radiosai.org/journals/Vol_06/01JAN08/04-bose.htm
Few words still from Sohail Inayatullah, Ph.D: Mahatma Gandhi and Shrii Prabhat Rainjan Sarkar are among the most significant thinkers to emerge from South Asia… Sarkar did not begin his social writings on PROUT until the late 1950s, and they are not from the same Vedantic tradition as Gandhi’s. Rather, the relative of Subash Chandra Bose, Sarkar was influenced by Tantra. Sarkar dedicated his first book - wherein he articulated his political economy - to Bose...
Defending Bose as one who passionately longed for the independence of India, Sarkar reminds us that “the Second World War was a war between two imperialist and expansionist forces”, for “neither the Axis or Allied powers were of the holy copper vessel and basil leaves that bathed in the water of the Ganges”...
Sarkar adds that “while it is undeniable that Mahatma Gandhi awakened mass consciousness, he did not channelize this awakened mass consciousness along the path of (economic) struggle”. From Sarkar’s view, if Gandhi had done so, true independence could have been possible – that is, sustained economic self-reliance...
“[Although his] ideas and ethics are of a high order, the soil of the world is too harsh for such pious appeals to collect their vital juice so easily for sustenance.” (Sarkar, 1983, 38) And Gandhi said, “Where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would choose violence”. The Interview, Part II: 'Gandhi was no saint'
Some more about Subhas Chanda Bose, her daughter tells:
Bose is alive http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOCQ-Su0P1E&feature=related
In 2011, At a Sant Sammelan, Revered Sadhus boldly proclaim been working under the supervision of Netaji,The Mahakaal! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx5kW64H7pQ&feature=related
Mysterius man; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKmIs64nQwM&feature=related
Gopal Godse on Youtube explains why his brother Nathuram killed Gandhi: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWZU5yROdkU&feature=related,
Google also:Proutscandinavia, Netajii, Subhash Chandra Bose never die...